Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Bartolomeo et al
as 3:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Associated Builders and Contractors, Associated Builders and Contractors of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Dante Bartolomeo, William Tong and Connecticut Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nevada Chapter of the Associated General Contract, et al v. Marty Walsh
as 22-16544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEVADA CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC., ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS NEVADA CHAPTER and NEVADA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTY WALSH, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
Earle Asphaly Co, et al v. County of Camden, et al
as 22-2648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARLE ASPHALY CO, LUIS SILVERIO and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INC NEW JERSEY CHAPTER
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY and UNITED BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY AFL CIO
Coalition v. Walsh
as 22-40316
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Coalition for Workforce Innovation, Associated Builders and Contractors and Southeast Texas, Associated Builders and Contractors, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Marty J. Walsh, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Jessica Looman, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Administrator, Division of Wage and Hour and United States Department of Labor
Metropolitan Washington Chapter, Associated Build, et al v. DC, et al
as 22-7014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Metropolitan Washington Chapter, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Miller & Long Concrete Construction, Inc. and Emmett Morris, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, a municipal corporation and Muriel Bowser, In her official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia
State of Georgia, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 21-14269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICS INSTITUTE
Assoc Builders and Contractors, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4083
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF ALABAMA, INC.
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., et al v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al
as 21-13910
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF ALABAMA, INC.
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, The State of Idaho and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Not Yet Classified:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Georgia, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
EARLE ASPHALT CO. et al v. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC et al
as 1:2021cv18355
Plaintiff:
Earle Asphalt Co., Luis Silverio and Associated Builders and Contractors New Jersey Chapter
Defendant:
County of Atlantic, South Jersey Building and Construction Trades Council, AFLCIO and SOUTH JERSEY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
