Cases 11 - 20 of 603
VIGNE v. RMS/PHH MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
MARTIN E. VIGNE
Defendant:
RMS/PHH MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS INC., ATTORNEY'S FOR RMS/PHH BOCA RATON 33487, ATTORNEY'S FOR RMS/PHH MT. LAUREL, NJ 08054 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Capital Hospice v. Becerra
as 1:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
Capital Hospice
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra, Xavier Becerra, Jessica D. Aber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
America 2030 Capital Limited v. Brantley et al
as 1:2023cv24769
Plaintiff:
America 2030 Capital Limited
Defendant:
Mark Brantley, Daniel Brantley Attorneys at Law, Brian Barnes and others
America 2030 Capital Limited v. Brantley et al
as 1:2023cv24772
Plaintiff:
America 2030 Capital Limited
Defendant:
Mark Brantley, Daniel Brantley Attorneys at Law, Brian Barnes and others
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, LLP, Law Firm and FRANKIE NEIL SPERO, Attorney
Mawule Tepe v. Travis R. McDonough, et al
as 23-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, in his U.S. District Chief Judge position, JANE DOE, I, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position, JANE DOE, II, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position and others
Bilheimer
as 2:2023at01257
Plaintiff:
Attorney for John Bilheimer
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Seguin v. Tyler Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2023cv04562
Plaintiff:
Mary Seguin
Defendant:
Tyler Technologies, Inc., Gero Meyersiek, Barbara Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Attorney Appointments/Petitions 2024
as 1:2024af07777
In Re:
Federal Attorney Appointments/Petitions 2024
Interested Party:
USAIAN.ECFCivCR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
