Cases 11 - 20 of 5,123
Williams v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Caleb Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Attorney General Of The United States and United States Attorney For The Eastern District of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5087
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Tarlochan Singh v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1602
Petitioner:
TARLOCHAN SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diego Andres v. Tony et al
as 0:2024cv60575
Petitioner:
Pascual Diego Andres
Defendant:
Gregory Tony, Attorney General of the United States and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cristian Torres v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1558
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN NOEL TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Merrick B. Garland v. Rony Soto Santos
as 24-1733
Petitioner:
Rony Alfredo Soto Santos
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Francisco Moran Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1520
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO SALVADOR MORAN MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
