Contract Cases
Focus Management Group USA, Inc. v. Autozone Parts, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00433
Plaintiff: FOCUS MANAGEMENT GROUP USA, INC., solely in its capacity as the court appointed General Receiver for AMS Investment Group, L.P.
Defendant: AUTOZONE PARTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
H & H Pars Inc v. AutoZone Inc
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff: H & H Pars, Inc. doing business as First Choice Auto and H & H Pars Inc doing business as First Choice Auto
Defendant: AutoZone, Inc. d/b/a AutoZone, AutoZone Inc doing business as AutoZone and AutoZone Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AutoZone Parts, Inc. v. Dearborn National Life Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv02830
Defendant: Dearborn National Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: AutoZone Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Ruth Hughes et al v. AutoZone Parts, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08009
Defendant: AutoZone Parts, Inc., AutoZone, Inc., AutoZone.com, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mary Ruth Hughes and Kevin Shenkman
Willaimson v. S.A. Gear Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00365
Plaintiff: Steve Williamson
Defendant: S.A. Gear Company, Inc., AutoZone, Inc., AutoZone Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Interactive Solutions Group, Inc. v. Autozone Parts, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv13182
Plaintiff: Interactive Solutions Group, Inc.
Defendant: Autozone Parts, Inc. and Hexaware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Autozone Parts, Inc. v. Systems Engineering Management Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00517
Plaintiff: Autozone Parts, Inc. and Autozone Parts, Inc.
Defendant: Systems Engineering Management Company, Inc. and Dennis R. Endee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?