Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00647
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Advanced Transactions, LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00270
Plaintiff: Advanced Transactions, LLC
Defendant: AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Rodriguez, et al v. Oshkosh Corporation et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant: Schneider Electric USA, Inc. formerly known as Square D Company, 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff: Oshkosh Corporation, Kirby Rodriguez and Patricia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04529
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
TAYLOR v. AUTOZONE INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02172
Plaintiff: EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR, SR.
Defendant: AUTOZONE INC. and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Noblewood IP LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01125
Plaintiff: Noblewood IP LLC
Defendant: AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?