Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Anderson #505022 v. Christiansen
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Anthony B. Anderson #505022
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Anderson v. Rosenlof et al
as 2:2023cv02375
Plaintiff:
William B. Anderson
Defendant:
S. Rosenlof, J. Melendez and M. Pham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Anderson v. Halbritter et al
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
William B Anderson and William B. Anderson
Defendant:
S. Halbritter, K. Rodgers, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON JR. et al v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2023cv20535
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON JR., JOSE N.M.I. VALENTINE, ISAAC JERDAN and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, MR. SIMS, M. BRANTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ericsson v. Anderson, et al.
as 3:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Gunnar Bjorn Ericsson
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Amy B Anderson and Warden Terema D Carlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Olson, et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Tracy B Anderson
Defendant:
Brian Foster, Sergeant Olson, Nurse York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers #069618 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Edmund V Powers
Defendant:
David Shinn, S Ojeda, R Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers #069618 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Edmund V Powers
Defendant:
David Shinn, S Ojeda, B Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2021cv08355
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, BRANTLEY and ASST. SUPT. NOGAN
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
NOGAN, DIRECTOR and BRANTLEY
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
