Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Tupper v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
John Tupper
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchfield v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles Burchfield
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yazdi v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Fred Yazdi
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riddick v. Mullens et al
as 7:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
C/O C. Mullens, Unit Manager Larry Collins, Sgt. B. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Lamar County Jail
as 4:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Joe B Barnett
Defendant:
Lamar County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Barnett et al
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Defendant:
B Barnett, Unknown Party, Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alex Pedrin v. T. Middleton, et al
as 21-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEX JOSEPH PEDRIN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER T. MIDDLETON, USP-McCreary, OFFICER DAULTON, USP-McCreary, WARDEN CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, USP-McCreary and others
Hanson v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Hanson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Cris Love, Kim Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Foley
as 21-10143
Defendant / Appellee:
B. Barnett, Michael Venable, Damon Andrews and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Neal, also known as Daniel Deshawn Neal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
