Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVENOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DIMAIO
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Chaisson v. Cunningham et al
as 6:2014cv00559
Plaintiff:
Queronde Chaisson
Defendant:
Chad B Cunningham, Andrew T Hudson and Leonard Foutz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv03746
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaston v. The City of Naperville et al
as 1:2014cv01897
Plaintiff:
William T. Gaston
Defendant:
The City of Naperville , Timothy Boogerd , S.E. Woodham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell et al v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Annabelle Powell , Galan Newton , Matthew Hochdorfer and others
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perez v. France
as 1:2013cv00829
Plaintiff:
Marcus Perez
Defendant:
James D France and John B Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
