Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Georgia Anne Gibson Pohocsucut, Gibson, Flora J Hood Howe and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Gibson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv01292
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Parker v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2017cv02892
Defendant:
Susan Brager, Larry Brown, Eric and others
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Worth et al v. Chang et al
as 3:2016cv00608
Plaintiff:
Alvester Fletcher Worth and Akeba Sia El Bey
Defendant:
Carmen B. Chang, Bank of America, Randall Hosse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starr v. Kober, et al
as 15-6219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL PAUL STARR
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER KOBER, correctional officer, SERGEANT BASHEAR, SERGEANT HAUNG, grievance officer and others
Starr v. Officer Kober, et al
as 14-6074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL PAUL STARR
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER KOBER, correctional officer, SERGEANT BASHEAR, SERGEANT HAUNG, grievance officer and others
Gibson v. Wallschlager et al
as 6:2013cv01459
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Gibson
Defendant:
Crissy Wallschlager and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Kober et al
as 5:2013cv00700
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Starr
Defendant:
FNU Kober, Sergeant Bashear, Sergeant Haung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
