Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Phillips v. Chappell et al
as 4:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
Richard Louis Arnold Phillips
Defendant:
Kevin R. Chappell , B. Ebert, Samuel Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EBERT et al v. TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON et al
as 3:2015cv07331
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE B. EBERT and REBECCA A. VARES-EBERT
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, KELLY A. YAEDE, JOHN DOE I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Threats v. Beard
as 3:2015cv02284
Plaintiff:
Derlyn Ray Threats
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Michael D. Stainer, Martin Hosnino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chappell et al
as 3:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Floyd Smith
Defendant:
K. Chappell, T. Moore, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Martel et al
as 3:2012cv03063
Plaintiff:
Clifton Perry
Defendant:
M. Martel, K. Chapelle, J. Curzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 5:2011cv05624
Plaintiff:
Melvin Turner
Defendant:
Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, M. Martel, T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Millette, et al
as 1:2011cv00076
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Perry , Jr.
Defendant:
Leroy F. Millette, Jr., Richard B. Potter, Claiborne T. Richardson, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuilaepa v. Ayers et al
as 3:2009cv02954
Plaintiff:
Paul Tuilaepa
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Jr., Max S. Lemon, D. A. Dacanay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinholster v. Wong et al
as 4:2009cv01744
Plaintiff:
Scott Pinholster
Defendant:
R. S. Wong, D. A. Dacanay, B. Grundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Tabarez v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-15661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY TABAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., MAX S. LEMON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
