Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Porter v. Hayes
as 5:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
John A. Porter, III
Defendant:
Shaiquida B. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Enrique Diaz v. ODOC, et al
as 22-35675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE ZACARIAS DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. CURHA, N. VANWECHAL and others
Diaz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Curha, N. Vanwechal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Priester et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2022cv80215
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Priester and Willie B Hayes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05809
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RESHAWN B HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. State of TX
as 20-20588
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden B. Hayes, Dinah R. Hoffman, Amy Salas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Peters v. The State Of Texas et al
as 4:2020cv03586
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Bobby Lumpkin, Dinah R Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv59224
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY B HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46044
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
