Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Augustine v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Michele Dauzat, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raul v. MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07757
Defendant:
James McLemore, David Michael Kramer, James R. Davis, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Pinchas Eliyahu Raul
King v. Criminal Justice Center, et al
as 2:2018cv02713
Respondent:
Jamie B. Kidd, J. Lammey, Criminal Justice Center and others
Petitioner:
Kejuan Antonise Dewayne King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kidd v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 2:2018cv02643
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susie B Kidd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01363
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Green
Defendant:
Tony C. Parker, Darren Settles, Doug Lawhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berger v. Distinctive Contract Services, LLC et al
as 0:2016cv60004
Plaintiff:
Mace Arthur Berger
Defendant:
Distinctive Contract Services, LLC and Jonathan B. Kidd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Lundstrom et al
as 8:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
David L. Hartman, Charles W. Hoskins, Randall B. Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ernest Thomas, Jr. v. Werholtz
as 07-3214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST LEE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATTY JAMES, Unit Team, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, LOUIS E BRUCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
