Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 180
In re: Christopher Robinson
as 17-1353
Petitioner: In re: CHRISTOPHER B. ROBINSON
Katherine B. Robinson v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1217
Plaintiff - Appellant: KATHERINE B. ROBINSON and DANA B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND and PROCTOR FINANCIAL, INC.
Robinson #206760 v. Campbell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00138
Petitioner: Christopher B. Robinson #206760
Respondent: Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Katherine B. Robinson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1163
Appellant: In re: KATHERINE B. ROBINSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1156
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Katherine B. Robinson v. DOJ/DEA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1036
Plaintiff - Appellant: KATHERINE B. ROBINSON
Plaintiff: DANA B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, (DOJ/DEA) and VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION
Robinson et al v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland et al
as 1:2016cv04119
Plaintiff: Katherine B. Robinson
Defendant: Chesapeake Bank of Maryland and Proctor Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson #206760 v. Campbell
as 1:2016cv01430
Petitioner: Christopher B. Robinson #206760
Respondent: Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2016cv09058
Plaintiff: SALADEEN B. ROBINSON
Defendant: ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03872
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?