Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03056
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02821
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
William Walker v. Bobbi Butts
as 23-5705
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM B. WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
BOBBI JO BUTTS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01740
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
USA v. Walker
as 23-30381
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Felecia B. Walker, also known as Felecia Walker, also known as Felicia Billinica
John McClintock, et al v. T. Cooper, et al
as 23-15513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT MCCLINTOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
T. COOPER, Sgt., M. ARMENTA, Guard, WINKLER, Guard and others
Defendant:
B. MCCLOUGHAN, JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, M. VOONG and others
Walker v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Randall B. Walker
Defendant:
John E. Doe, Handy Dagg Remodeling and Carpentry, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mars, P.A. v. Walker
as 5:2022cv05209
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Mars, P.A. doing business as Mars Law Firm
Defendant:
Judd B. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Carl Norton v. Wilkins & Co. Realty, Inc.
as 22-1933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL T. NORTON and NORHURST PROPERTIES DANVILLE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
WILKINS & CO. REALTY, INC., JAMES BUCKNER, EDWARD B. WALKER and others
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04564
Plaintiff:
KEVA B WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.