Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Roshune Carelock v. Jeff Johnson
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSHUNE LEMARR CARELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, LYNETTE PATTON, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Defendant:
TRACY BLACK, NATALIE GAMBLE, MR. CHARLES and others
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Unnamed, Lt. G. Adams, B. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020cv01635
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Lynnette Patton, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boone #501976 v. MaCauley et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Joshua Langdon, Bent Simon, Subrina Alken and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Boone #501976
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovings v. Court and Legal Department et al
as 7:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Offender Management Services, Court and Legal Department, Charnelle Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Lovings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Landry et al
as 3:2019cv00799
Petitioner:
Earl B. Young
Respondent:
Sandy McCain and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meyers v. Baker et al
as 7:2019cv00711
Defendant:
A. Rivero, J. Hounshell, A. Vanhuss and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00558
Defendant:
AW Anderson, Prison Guard Cox, AW Combs and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Kingham, Jr. v. Ronald Tadlock, et al
as 18-11451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. KINGHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. TADLOCK, SAMMY HILL, TOMMY B. YOUNG and others
Moore #223268 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore #223268
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
