Cases 41 - 50 of 221
Horace Lucious v. B.O.P.
as 5:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
Horace Lucious
Defendant:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allee v. Barr et al
as 7:2021cv00084
Defendant:
The House Senate, Corrections Information Council Office, Washington, DC, J. Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Justin J. Allee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kareen Anderson v. B.O.P. et al
as 5:2020cv02673
Defendant:
Chaplin Chasse, Victorville FCCII Warden Pliers, Ms Ruda and others
Plaintiff:
Kareen Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 6:2020cv00103
Respondent:
Warden Trevonze Bobbit, GDC Commissioner, U.S. Marshals and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Black v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv03538
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Attorney General William Barr, USDC Judge Baverman and others
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. US Marshals Services et al
as 6:2020cv00898
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
US Marshals Services, B.O.P. and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Harmond et al
as 1:2020cv01070
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Arias v. Nevada Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 3:2020cv00242
Respondent:
B.O.P of Nev., Aaron Ford and Renee Baker
Petitioner:
Manuel Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kipper Ken King v. Director of Federal B.O.P. et al
as 5:2020cv00723
Defendant:
Shortis, R. Ruman and Director of Federal B.O.P.
Plaintiff:
Kipper Ken King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figueroa et al vs. Trump et al
as 9:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
Benny Ramos-David, Ranking Smith, Servando Jose Gomez and others
Defendant:
United States B.O.P., William Barr and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
