Cases 1 - 10 of 311
Jones v. Baker Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Eric Jones
Defendant:
Baker Transportation, Inc. and ICE Recycling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Baker v. Sumner County et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Kevin Baker
Defendant:
Sumner County, Gary #455 and Bouchard #534
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driskell v. Baker et al
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Driskell
Defendant:
Arkeycia Baker, Endrea Howard and Kathy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Sumner County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
Kevin Baker, Marlon Thackston and Caleb Carter
Defendant:
Sumner County Jail and Owen Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marilyn Donald, et al v. Bonner, et al
as 2:2023cv02738
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Shelby County and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Donald and Charles Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
US Framing International, LLC v. Continental Building Company et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
US Framing International, LLC
Defendant:
Continental Building Company, Rick Adante, Todd Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Baker v. Breuche
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Myles Baker
Defendant:
Lara Breuche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Baker v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Myles Baker
Defendant:
Matthew Neal and Anna Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Anderson et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
