Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Sorbello v. Agco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Sorbello
Defendant:
Agco Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv17134
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv16590
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv14163
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Speck v. 3M Company
as 3:2020cv05845
Defendant:
VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION), 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING, MetalClad Insulation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Speck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PALLIS v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv00495
Defendant:
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION and GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
GLORIA D PALLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
WALLACE v. BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00457
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WALLACE
Defendant:
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
