Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wicker v. Bay View Loan Services, et al
as 19-4169
Respondent / Appellee:
BAY VIEW LOAN SERVICES, LLC and US BANK
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES B. WICKER
Medina v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv00858
Defendant:
Bay View Loan Service, LLC, Bank of New York Mellon, MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps. and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus R. Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
SCHMIDT et al v. BAY VIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
as 2:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCHMIDT and SHANNON SCHMIDT
Defendant:
BAY VIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lareybi v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2017cv00003
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Bay View Loan Servicing, LLC, Law Offices of Les Zieve and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lareybi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert G. Pedrino v. Bay View Loan Servicer LLC et al
as 8:2016cv01935
Defendant:
Bay View Loan Servicer LLC, Does and MTC Financial Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert G Pedrino
Wieland et al v. Bay View Loan Servicing, LLC
as 3:2016cv05498
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Wieland and Shelley L. Wieland
Defendant:
Bay View Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Broccoli v. Bay View Loan Servicing LLC
as 1:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
John Edward Broccoli
Defendant:
Bay View Loan Servicing LLC, Richard A Dion and Walter J. Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorothy Hartman v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 15-3818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY M. HARTMAN, a/k/a Dorothy M. Hartman
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a the Bank of New York, Trustee for the Certificate Holder of CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2005-86CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificats Series 2005-86-CB, c/o Bank of America, N.A., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRUDENTIAL FOX & ROACH REALTORS, known as Prudential Real Estate and and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
