Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Daniel et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00665
Plaintiff:
Terry Daniel and James Daniel
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2005-2, Assest-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Bank of New York Mellon, et al v. Randhawa, et al
as 2:2018cv00224
Defendant:
Iqbal S. Randhawa and Paul Randhawa
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust and Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Darby Financial Products v. Barclays Bank PLC
as 17-2352
Plaintiff:
The Berkshire Bank, Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and Directors Financial Group
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darby Financial Products and Capital Ventures International
Defendant - Appellee:
Barclays Bank PLC, Deutsche Bank AG, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Copeland et al v. The Axion Mortgage Group LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mitchell L. Copeland and Terry Potts
Defendant:
The Axion Mortgage Group LLC, U.S. Bank, National Association, as successor to Bank of America, National Association, as trustee and successor by merger to Lasalle Bank National Association, , Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dolan, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Mortgage Modifi, et al
as 15-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DOLAN and SHERRILYN DOLAN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIRGINIA LUSCINSKI and THEODORE LUSCINSKI, on behalf of themselves and the certified class of similarly situated individuals
Plaintiff:
MINDY B. SENTER, RENEE JERRAM, CHRISTOPHER JERRAM and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
DONNA M. FOLLMER, f/k/a Donna M. Marshall and MICHAEL FOLLMER
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., EMC MORTGAGE LLC, f/k/a EMC Mortgage Corporation and THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC.
Defendant:
DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERICAS LLC
SHEEHAN v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA et al
as 1:2014cv07385
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. SHEEHAN, IV
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA , WILMINGTON TRUST, NA, CITIBANK, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
U.S. Bank National Assoc. v. Chung Kho
as 14-13360
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, successor in interest to Bank of America, N.A. successor by merger with LaSalle Bank National Association as trustee for Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certifi
Defendant - Appellant:
CHUNG S. KHO
U.S. Bank National Assoc. v. Daniel Lee
as 14-13358
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, successor in interest to Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger with LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee for Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certi
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL K. LEE and CHUNG S. KHO
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, TRUSTEE, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR BEAR STEARNS COMMER v. BROAD STREET REALTY ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06971
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, TRUSTEE, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR BEAR STEARNS
Defendant:
BROAD STREET REALTY ENTERPRISES, LLC, PAULINE HARARI and MORRIS HARARI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America v. Bear Stearns Asset Management
as 13-3847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bank of America, National Association and U.S. Bank National Association, solely in its capacity as Trustee under the Indenture
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Banc of America Securities LLC
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Ralph Cioffi, Raymond McGarrigal, Matthew Tannin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
