Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Bence v. Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv00440
Plaintiff:
Lauren Bence
Defendant:
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc. doing business as New Lifehouse Girls Academy and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bence v. Toquerville, City of
as 4:2025cv00137
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bence
Defendant:
Toquerville, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bence v. Colvin
as 2:2025cv00006
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Bence
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bence v. Colvin
as 4:2025cv00054
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Bence
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Edwards v. Banks et al
as 2:2024cv01493
Defendant:
Officer Banks, Duggan, Officer Benc and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aamer et al v. Eden Gallery Group Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv07678
Plaintiff:
Fabio Colbrelli, Maximo Hoever, Mark OShea and others
Defendant:
Eden Gallery Group Ltd., Cathia Klimovsky, Guy Martinovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bence v. Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bence
Defendant:
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
BENCE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16672
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BENCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv06520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kiss v. Romano et al
as 1:2022cv05774
Plaintiff:
Bence Kiss
Defendant:
Nicolette Romano and Vincenzo Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
