Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bennett v. USA
as 5:2026cv00273
Petitioner: James Bernard Bennett, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
In re: Bernard Bennett
as 26-1856
Petitioner: In re: BERNARD BENNETT
Respondent: BEN VARNER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
USA v. Bennett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-60491
Defendant: Quishaun Bernard Bennett
Plaintiff: United States of America
US v. James Bennett, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-4459
Defendant: JAMES BERNARD BENNETT, JR.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION INC. [FNMA] et al v. BENNETT et al
as 5:2017cv00015
Plaintiff: FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION INC and CIT BANK NA
Defendant: KASSIE E BENNETT, JANICE J BENNETT, YVONNE BENNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Gregory Randolph v. Powercomm Construction, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2370
Plaintiff - Appellee: GREGORY RANDOLPH, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DANA BROWN, TWANDA BANISTER and others
Plaintiff: VAN EUBANKS, DAVID PETERSON, JACQUELINE RIDLEY and others
Defendant - Appellant: POWERCOMM CONSTRUCTION, INC. and DAVID KWASNIK, SR.
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 5:2015ct03095
Plaintiff: Hazel Bernard Bennett
Defendant: Frank Perry, Thomas E. Asbell, Esta Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Bernard Bennett
as 13-4530
Petitioner: In re: BERNARD BENNETT
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
BENNETT v. VARNER et al
as 2:2013cv05226
Petitioner: BERNARD BENNETT
Respondent: BEN VARNER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re: Bernard Bennett
as 13-3550
Petitioner: BERNARD BENNETT
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?