Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Jones v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jones
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as KYW/3:16-cv-00265
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jones
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00265
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jones
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Beverly Jones, et al v. Procter and Gamble Distributin, et al
as 15-12340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY JONES and STEVE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING, LLC and THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING CO.
Montesa v. Schwartz
as 14-3721
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rebecca Montesa, individually and as a parent and natural guardian of C.W., E.W. and N.W., infants, Marie Jean Baptiste, individually and as a parent and natural guardian of PJB, DJB, and DJB, infants, Israel Mediua, individually and as a parent and natural guardian of H.M., infant and others
Defendant:
East Ramapo Central School District
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Schwartz, Yehuda Weissmandl, Moses Friedman and others
JONES v. REGIS CORPORATION
as 5:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY JONES
Defendant:
REGIS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv03290
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02780
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
