Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOT USED
as 4:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
RYAN OSBORN
Defendant:
JAMIE OSBORN, LEE TITTLE, AARON H. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Osborn et al v. Tittle et al
as 4:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
Ryan Osborn and Jamie Osborn
Defendant:
Lee Tittle, Aaron H Brown, Big Boys, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
United States of America v. Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $472,479.00 Seized from the Following Locations Within Big Boys, Inc., Kenly, North Carolina:
as 5:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $472,479.00 Seized from the Following Locations Within Big Boys, Inc., Kenly, North Carolina:
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Dittmer et al v. Curis Restaurants Inc et al
as 2:2011cv11417
Plaintiff:
Brian Dittmer and Duane Meagher
Defendant:
Curis Restaurants Inc, Curis Properties Limited Partnership, Curis Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Heeren Brothers, Inc. v. Caledonia Food Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00919
Plaintiff:
Heeren Brothers, Inc.
Defendant:
Caledonia Food Service, Inc., Trends Cafe, LLC, Greenville Big Boy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Heeren Brothers, Inc. v. Cedar Springs Big Boy, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01212
Plaintiff:
Heeren Brothers, Inc.
Defendant:
Cedar Springs Big Boy, Inc., Dale Breen and Daniel Bohner, II
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Big Boy Restaurants International LLC v. Big Boy, Inc.
as 5:2008cv00544
Plaintiff:
Big Boy Restaurants International LLC
Defendant:
Big Boy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
