Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Phoenix et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Defendant:
The 3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Phoenix, Christine April Martinez, Orlando Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
FLINT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08524
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LANE FLINT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Bobbie Kendle
as 19-13296
Defendant / Appellant:
BOBBIE LANE KENDLE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LANE et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv01667
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LANE and LINDA LANE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, MERCK & CO. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Bobbie Kendle
as 16-14175
Petitioner:
In re: BOBBIE LANE KENDLE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kendle v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv22669
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Lane Kendle
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lane v. Guile
as 2:2016cv04178
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lane
Defendant:
Guile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delmar Shelby v. Ronald Woodall, et al
as 15-60054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELMAR EARL SHELBY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR RONALD WOODALL, GWEN WOODLAND, APRIL MEGGS and others
USA v. Bobbi Kendle
as 13-12902
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BOBBI LANE KENDLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
