Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Booth v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Channing Booth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Booth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Damian Booth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reco Manning v. United States, et al
as 23-1799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reco D. Manning
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Orr v. United States of America, Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv03098
Petitioner:
Jeremy Orr
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice
Respondent:
David Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ingram v. Booth
as 0:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Clifton Ingram
Defendant:
Sgt. Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Sevier County et al
as 4:2023cv04018
Plaintiff:
James Sutton
Defendant:
Sevier County, Robert Gentry, Wendell Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Reco Manning v. United States, et al
as 22-2652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reco D. Manning
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
