Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robert Gillens v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6227
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, DOE #1, unknown mail staff/supervisor, KENNETH CRADDOCK, Discipline Hearing Officer and others
Roberts v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Timothy Munro Roberts
Defendant:
USA, BOP Director Collette Peters, Yankton FPC, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Robert Reed v. Michael, et al.
as 23-6656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL, a/k/a Mike, U.S. Marshal, PHILLIP CORNELIOUS, D.C. Superior Court Agent, JEQUAN JACKSON, U.S. Parole Case Analyst and others
Cobble v. US Government et al
as 6:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble, Johnathan Wayne Plemons, Daniel Castleberry and others
Defendant:
US Government, US BOP, US BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
GANDY v. BOP DIRECTOR
as 1:2022cv00151
Petitioner:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Respondent:
BOP DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Asplund v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Janette M. Asplund
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandon v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
Shanna Brandon
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Syslo v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Taylor Syslo
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Plaintiff:
Belinda Barker
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belcher v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Rhonda S. Belcher
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
