Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04318
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parsard v. The City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2026cv06540
Plaintiff:
Natasha Parsard
Defendant:
The City of Mount Vernon, FNU Tetay, Charles Rizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Bowen v. Wamp et al
as 1:2026cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert Drayton Bowen
Defendant:
Weston Wamp, Ken Smith, Lee Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Wamp et al
as 1:2026cv00210
Plaintiff:
Robert Drayton Bowen
Defendant:
Weston Wamp, Ken Smith, Lee Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Wamp et al
as 1:2026cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert Drayton Bowen
Defendant:
Weston Wamp, Ken Smith, Lee Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Wamp et al
as 1:2026cv00208
Plaintiff:
Robert Drayton Bowen
Defendant:
Weston Wamp, Austin Garrett, Timothy A. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Wamp et al
as 1:2026mc00034
Plaintiff:
Robert Drayton Bowen
Defendant:
Weston Wamp, Ken Smith, Lee Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wellington #508689 v. Three Rivers Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv02202
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lloyd Wellington #508689
Defendant:
Three Rivers Police Department, Unknown Dibble and Unknown Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bowen v. Wamp et al
as 1:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
Robert Drayton Bowen
Defendant:
Weston Wamp, Austin Garrett, Timothy A. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
