Cases 41 - 50 of 1,060
BRAXTON v. ROPER
as 1:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
CPL. ROPER and ROPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. PIPE
as 1:2023cv03023
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
JUDITH PIPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20160
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BRAXTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richardson v. Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Dustin Richardson
Defendant:
Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Nurse Destiny Drake, Braxton County Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Braxton v. Earl Young
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES BRAXTON
Defendant / Appellee:
EARL SYLVESTER YOUNG and MISS DONNA P. NICHOLAS
Anthony Braxton v. USA
as 23-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Braxton-Robertson v. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv05569
Plaintiff:
Catina Braxton-Robertson
Defendant:
Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
GREENE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08795
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON GREENE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anthony Braxton v. Superior Court for the District of Columbia
as 23-7122
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
Superior Court for the District of Columbia
Honeycutt v. Labat et al
as 1:2023cv04317
Plaintiff:
Taylor Braxton Honeycutt
Defendant:
Sheriff Patrick Labat, Sgt. Obasi and Head of Maintenance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
