Cases 1 - 10 of 26
CHAPMAN v. TRAVEL RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
TRAVEL RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chapman v. MobileHelp, LLC
as 9:2023cv81415
Plaintiff:
Brian Chapman
Defendant:
MobileHelp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Titus Henderson v. Jason Aldana, et al
as 23-2612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON ALDANA, BRIAN CHAPMAN, KEVIN MADDEN and others
Chapman v. Senior Healthcare Advisors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Brian Chapman
Defendant:
Senior Healthcare Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chapman v. Senior Healthcare Advisors, LLC
as 6:2023cv06246
Plaintiff:
Brian Chapman
Defendant:
Senior Healthcare Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CHAPMAN v. ELOCAL USA, LLC
as 2:2022cv03383
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
ELOCAL USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CHAPMAN v. THS GROUP LLC
as 2:2022cv05076
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
THS Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Terrance Shaw v. Brian Chapman, et al
as 22-2419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW and TERRANCE JAMES SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN CHAPMAN, TONYEKA NOEL and TODD THILLEMANN
Hessee et al v. American Protection Plans LLC
as 9:2022cv80748
Plaintiff:
Robert Hessee, Naomi Carter and Brian Chapman
Defendant:
American Protection Plans LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
