Cases 1 - 10 of 24
WHITE v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF GREENE COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00223
Petitioner:
MATTHEW BRIAN WHITE
Defendant:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF GREENE COUNTY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WARREN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kemmerly v. Hill et al
as 5:2019cv03086
Defendant:
Jeremy Woodson, Cody Maley, Brian White and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Kemmerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Brian White
Defendant:
Westchester County, Aramark Correctional Services, Kevin D. Cheverko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benge #137719 v. Corizon Health LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00349
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Benge
Defendant:
Corizon Health LLC, Unknown Smiley, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv00730
Plaintiff:
Brian White
Defendant:
Westchester County, New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services, P.C., Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baines v. The City of New York
as 17-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donnell Baines
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Brian White, Tax #927773, Individually and as a Police Officer for the City of New York and others
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, #1, Officer John Doe, #2, Officer John Doe, #3 and others
Brian White v. Jeffrey Wood
as 17-1680
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
PENDLETON v. WHITE et al
as 3:2017cv02694
Plaintiff:
RONALD PENDLETON
Defendant:
BRIAN WHITE and CAITLIN SIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENDLETON v. JUSTUS et al
as 3:2017cv02695
Plaintiff:
RONALD PENDLETON
Defendant:
LESLIE ANN JUSTUS, BRIAN WHITE, CAITLIN SIDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
