Cases 41 - 50 of 932
Anikka King v. Tom Broderick, et al
as 23-1584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANIKKA KING
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM BRODERICK and CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANA
Vincent Wilson v. Beth Arthur
as 23-6293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
BETH ARTHUR, Sheriff, CAPTAIN BURGESS and BRODERICK LINDSEY, Captain
McHenry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Broderick Maximillion McHenry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McHenry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Broderick Maximillion McHenry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Jones
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Broderick Jones and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
PAYTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
ALANA PAYTON, COLE M. RADICIC, MATTHEW WHELIHAN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Broderick Warfield v. Solano County Public Defenders Office, et al
as 23-15274
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRODERICK J. WARFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
SOLANO COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, SOLANO COUNTY FAIRFIELD, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICES, SOLANO COUNTY CONFLICT DEFENDER OFFICES and others
Vincent Wilson v. Broderick Lindsey
as 23-6177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
BRODERICK LINDSEY, Captain
Broderick v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv10444
Plaintiff:
John E. Broderick
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCarty v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Desmond McCarty
Defendant:
Broderick Jones, Corey Flagg, Terry G Hillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
