Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Maybee v. Sheldon et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Frankie Jerrell Maybee
Defendant:
Mark A Sheldon, Hagler, R Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dean Wooten
Defendant:
USA, Bureau of Prisons and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T Outlaw, Nadar Peikar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00481
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. FCI - Forrest City et al
as 2:2013cv00068
Defendant:
FCI - Forrest City, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mark A Sheldon and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Ward et al
as 2:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Addones Spencer
Defendant:
L Ward, W Annton, S Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Halke et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
