General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 658
Bailey v. Kitho et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Petitioner: Troy Bailey
Respondent: Laura Kitho, Warden Shoemaker, Nancy Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Borla We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00316
Petitioner: Jasper Bailey
Respondent: Ron E. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Calvery County-State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner: Danny Jones
Respondent: Calvery County-State of Maryland, William Bailey and Attorney General of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner: Arthur Bailey
Respondent: Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner: Arthur Bailey
Respondent: Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. Borla We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06658
Petitioner: Jasper Bailey
Respondent: Warden Ron E. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacob Rader v. Mack Bailey
as 23-7245
Petitioner / Appellant: JACOB RADER
Respondent / Appellee: MACK BAILEY, Warden
Bailey v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01834
Petitioner: Arthur Jay Bailey
Respondent: Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gebar Byrd v. Michele Buckner, et al
as 23-3640
Petitioner / Appellant: Gebar Byrd
Respondent / Appellee: Michele Buckner, In her official capacity as acting warden of Potosi Correctional Center and Andrew Bailey, Attorney General of Missouri
Bailey v. Vantell
as 1:2023cv01257
Petitioner: Jamie Bailey
Respondent: Warden Vance Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?