Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Blake v. Kerns et al
as 8:2016cv02090
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Jeannie Marie Kerns, Baltimore Sun Paper & Editor in Chief and Annie Linnsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. The Baltimore Sun Co. et al
as 1:2015cv01840
Plaintiff:
Donta Vaughn
Defendant:
The Baltimore Sun Co., Brandi B. and Ian Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Kerns et al
as 8:2014cv00832
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Jeanne Marie Kerns, Baltimore Sun Paper & Editor in Chief and Annie Linnsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC
as 09-7612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, of Maryland and New York, VENABLE LLP, of Maryland and New York and others
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC
as 09-6556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, MD and NY, VENABLE, of MD and NY and others
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC
as 09-6356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, of Maryland and New York, VENABLE LLP, of Maryland and New York and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
