Cases 41 - 50 of 514
Muldrow v. State of Arkansas et al
as 4:2022cv04122
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Muldrow
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, Hempstead County, Arkansas, Miller County, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gamada Hussein v. Walmart Inc., et al
as 22-3507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee:
Walmart, Inc., U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Bank, Neosho Branch and others
Meadows v. North American Savings Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Diane Meadows
Defendant:
North American Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Naudet v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
as 4:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Naudet
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simms v. Cental Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
Franklin Shane Simms
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
