Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 277
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donalson v. City of Canton, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff: Barney Donalson doing business as God's Property Ministries
Defendant: City of Canton, Texas, David Ritter, Edwin Voss and others
Intervenor: Richard Grega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1224
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee: JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX, JUDGE JAY WINWARD, STATE OF UTAH and others
Hyde Rhodes v. Barney
as 24-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee: TED BARNEY and KAYLA CORPENBARGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hyde-Rhodes v. Barney, et al
as 23-4135
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIM HYDE-RHODES
Defendant / Appellee: TED BARNEY and KAYLA CORPENBARGER
Hyde Rhodes v. Barney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00079
Plaintiff: Kim Hyde Rhodes
Defendant: Ted Barney and Kayla Corpenbarger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02769
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?