Cases 1 - 10 of 526
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11174
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller and The City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11126
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller, The City of Detroit and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Not Yet Classified:
Xplore, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katie Baugh
Defendant:
Mikkar Kang, Explore, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Baugh v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2024cv10036
Plaintiff:
Ryan Baugh
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Crystal Clear v. HK Baugh Ranch
as 23-50928
Plaintiff:
Crystal Clear Special Utility District
Intervenor:
HK Baugh Ranch, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
