Cases 51 - 60 of 723
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
(PC)Miller v. Beam et al
as 3:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lee Miller
Defendant:
E. Beam and T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ducksworth, Brian v. Beam, Officer et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Brian Armon Ducksworth
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Officer Beam, Correctional Officer Murphy, Correctional Officer Marciulionis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miller v. Beam et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lee Miller
Defendant:
E. Beam and T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bahar Mikhak v. University of Phoenix, Inc., et al
as 23-15000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAHAR MIKHAK
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC., RYAN BERMAN, CATHY MALONE and others
Abuda et al v. Strongblock et al
as 1:2022cv10869
Plaintiff:
Eileen Advincula, Chukwuemeka Agiri, Daley Antoine and others
Defendant:
David C Moss, Brian Abramson, Corey J Lederer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Jaeger et al v. Jaeger et al
as 3:2022cv04615
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jaeger and SLP Advisory LLP
Defendant:
Abigail Jaeger, Brittany T Kaliher, Beam Technologies LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Andrew Patterson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kevin Beam v. Watco Transloading, LLC
as 22-3201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEVIN BEAM
Defendant / Appellant:
WATCO TRANSLOADING, LLC
London v. Heh et al
as 1:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Ali London
Defendant:
Michael Heh, Maria Heh, Wendy Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
