Cases 1 - 10 of 24
United States v. Freeman Whitfield, IV
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Freeman Whitfield, IV, also known as Mr. Furley, also known as Furl, also known as Farley, also known as Mr. Farley, also known as Furley Beam, also known as Furley
Thomas v. Calfee et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Clay Irwin Thomas
Defendant:
Jason Calfee, Lovell, Pierce and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beam v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02893
Plaintiff:
Patrick Beam
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Beam v. Adams et al
as 4:2023cv04026
Plaintiff:
Michael Beam
Defendant:
Golden Captain Adams, Sergeant Golden, Sergeant Hanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almendinger et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01665
Plaintiff:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Beam v. Hagood Holdings LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00984
Plaintiff:
Alysha Beam
Defendant:
Hagood Holdings LLC, Julie Hagood and Jarred Hagood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
David Almendinger, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-3238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Hansmeier v. MacLaughlin et al
as 0:2021cv01540
Defendant:
Beam Properties LLC, Anders Folk, David MacLaughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Hansmeier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beam et al v. Otter Tail Power Company et al
as 1:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Gregory Beam and Amy Beam
Defendant:
Otter Tail Power Company and The Babcock & Wilcox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Friar et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02248
Plaintiff:
Larry Tittle, Keith Ackerman, Enace Lococo and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
