Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Nickles v. Taylor et al
as 4:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Randy Nickles
Defendant:
Taylor, Spraberry, DW Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furr v. Williams et al
as 5:2022ct03454
Plaintiff:
Julian Terell Furr
Defendant:
Vivian Williams, Jefferey Jerinkin, Captain Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rizk v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Wisam R. Rizk
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Carvajal and Gene Beasly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Trice v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Deputy Officer FNU Wilcox, Counselor Veronica Stewart, Deputy Officer FNU Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Demond Trice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephans v. Jackson County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Stephans
Defendant:
Brian Welmon, Jackson County Courthouse, James Clawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Beasly v. Michaels Store, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07770
Defendant:
VIXXO Corporation, FM Facility Maintenance, LLC., Michaels Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Latanya Beasly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Beasly et al
as 2:2018cv00768
Defendant:
FNU Bube, FNU Dumont, FNU Widdowson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemente v. Beasly et al
as 2:2017cv00948
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Clemente
Defendant:
J. Beasly, S. Dill, Rocke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joihnnie Shaffer, Jr. v. William Danforth, et al
as 16-16007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOIHNNIE SHAFFER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM DANFORTH, KYLE MADDOX, CO I, FASON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
