Cases 71 - 80 of 347
GROOMS v. TRITTON et al
as 2:2020cv09610
Defendant:
HARRIET EDELMAN, HARSHA RAMALINGAM, STEPHANIE BELL-ROSE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GROOMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Peoples v. Bed Bath & Beyond of California Limited Liability Company
as 5:2020cv04732
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond of California Limited Liability Company
Plaintiff:
Emerald Peoples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE BED BATH & BEYOND STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 2:2020cv08673
Defendant:
VIRGINIA P. RUESTERHOLZ, JOHNATHAN B. OSBORNE, HARRIET EDELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
OLUFEMI SALU
Consolidated Plaintiff:
KEVIN GROOMS and GREG MANTIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GRI-EQY (Presidential Markets) LLC v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
as 1:2020cv02828
Plaintiff:
GRI-EQY (Presidential Markets) LLC
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards Clearview, L.L.C. v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
as 2:2020cv01709
Plaintiff:
Richards Clearview, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jubilee-Sawmill LLC v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02974
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jubilee-Sawmill LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SDI Millenia, LLC v. Bed, Bath & Beyond et al
as 3:2020cv01056
Plaintiff:
SDI Millenia, LLC
Defendant:
Bed, Bath & Beyond and DOES 1-30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
National Retail Properties, LP v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
as 1:2020cv00585
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Plaintiff:
National Retail Properties, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rooney v. Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00687
Plaintiff:
John Rooney
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Bed, Bath, & Beyond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
