Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Palmer v. Beebe et al
as 5:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
William Edward Palmer
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Democratic Party Arkansas et al
as 3:2014cv00254
Defendant:
Democratic Party Arkansas, Will Bonds, Candace Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Emerson v. Beebe
as 5:2014cv05320
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Emerson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Beebe
as 4:2014cv00620
Plaintiff:
Tina M Emerson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodall v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00617
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Woodall, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Mary Fallon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Rantrez Robinson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, John Felts, Shelia Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 3:2014cv03091
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers, John Doe #1 & #2, Quorum Court of Marion County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Digital Recognition Network, et al v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 14-3084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Digital Recognition Network, Inc. and Vigilant Solutions Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas and Dustin McDaniel, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas
Hammond et al v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 4:2014cv00613
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A. , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , GMAC Mortgage, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Hammond and Tim Beebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Lester v. Bradford Phelps, et al
as 14-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant - Appellee:
Bradford J. Phelps, Chief Deputy, Arkansas Attorney General, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
