Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Carrick v. Beebe et al
as 4:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Calvin Carrick
Defendant:
Mike Beebe , Dustin McDaniel and Larry Crane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Beebe et al
as 4:2013cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Mike Beebe , Tim D Fox , Chris Piazza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin et al v. Corizon Correctional Medical Services et al
as 5:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Martin
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Medical Services, Gaylon Lay, Crystal Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander/Ryahim v. Beebe et al
as 4:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
Charles E Alexander/Ryahim, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Mark Pryor, Mike Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jernigan et al v. Crane et al
as 4:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Rita Jernigan , Pam Jernigan , Becca Austin and others
Defendant:
Larry Crane, Mike Beebe and Dustin McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Johnny Nichols v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 13-2377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnny Lee Nichols
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Arkansas, Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas and Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Keith Ashlock vs. Brent Miller, et al
as 6:2013cv06054
Plaintiff:
Keith Ashlock
Defendant:
Brent A. Miller, Didi Sallings, Brendan Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beebe v. Ramsey County et al
as 0:2013cv00999
Plaintiff:
John Michael Beebe
Defendant:
Ramsey County and John Does 1-6
Nichols v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 5:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Mike Beebe and Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy Cantrell v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 12-3371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Attorney General of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
