Cases 41 - 50 of 25,468
Nicholas v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv03256
Plaintiff:
Paulette Nicholas
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bell v. Weinreb Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02979
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Bell
Defendant:
Weinreb Management LLC and Jacobe Weinreb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baah v. AT&T Inc. West, et al.
as 24-2541
Plaintiff:
ALEX BAAH
Defendant:
AT&T INC. WEST, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT AND T CORP. and others
Pamelia Bell v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Pamelia Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley and Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bell v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Rashad Bell
Defendant:
Ronald Ivey, Lynesha Square and Haleigh Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arellano et al v. Becton et al
as 4:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
Stephen Arellano, The Public, Brysen Arellano and others
Defendant:
Diana Becton, Rob Bonta, Mary Ann O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Richardson v. Bell
as 7:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brian Richardson
Defendant:
Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
