Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Etha Jones, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
McCurry et al v. Mccurry et al
as 2:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry and Etha Jones
Defendant:
Benjamin Curtis Mccurry, Gary McCurry, Cindy McCurry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 23-5929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
BIVINS v. CITY OF MACON GA et al
as 5:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CURTIS BIVINS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON GA, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, DEPUTY JEREMIAH MONEY PENNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93069
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CURTIS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Time Videos, LLC v. Curtis
as 1:2012cv03773
Plaintiff:
First Time Videos, LLC
Defendant:
Benjamin Curtis
Jones v. United States of America
as 0:2009cv60745
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Curtis Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Neitzke et al v. Lowrance
as 4:2009cv04028
Plaintiff:
Mark Neitzke, Paul A Vis, Julie Vis and others
Defendant:
Jeff Lowrance
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Martin v. Townsend et al
as 6:2008cv01287
Plaintiff:
Phillip Delane Martin
Defendant:
Ed Townsend, Winston County Jail, James Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
