Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Melton v. Doe
as 2:2025cv00217
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Matthew Melton
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown v. Matthew et al
as 9:2025cv00030
Defendant:
Ms. Johnson, Sgt. Benjamin Matthew and Warden Kenneth Sharp
Plaintiff:
Vernon Samuels Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTHEWS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12512
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MATTHEWS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6213 Injunctive Relief from IRS Lien
GOODMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12239
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MATTHEW GOODMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May et al v. M.R. Associates, L.P.
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Caroline May, Benjamin Matthew-Blake Hall, Caroline Hall and others
Defendant:
M.R. Associates, L.P. and Stacy West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
DOLLAR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12760
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MATTHEW DOLLAR and BENJAMIN M DOLLAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOODMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73401
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MATTHEW GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RADER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14626
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MATTHEW RADER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benjamin Matthews v. Harris County, Texas
as 20-20046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN MATTHEWS
Defendant / Appellee:
KFGF ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, doing business as Carrington's, Carrington's Sports Bar, and Carrington's Billiards
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03004
Plaintiff:
CAROL DANKS, KEVIN A CLAFTON, COLT BOWIE CAUMUNE and others
Defendant:
MOHAMMD JAVAD ZARIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
