Cases 21 - 30 of 326
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armstrong Ford, Inc. et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG FORD, INC. doing business as CLONINGER FORD OF HICKORY, ASHEBORO FORD, INC., BOYD BROTHERS FORD, INC. and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Benson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Benson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Benson v. Securitas Security Services
as 5:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Antinette Benson
Defendant:
Securitas Security Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Shell, Barry Kenneth Abrams, Michael Absher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Owen v. Mackey et al
as 7:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Francis Owen
Defendant:
#72 Lt. Mackey, Hau #114 Custard, Sgt. Geronamis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv02953
Petitioner:
Jerrod Lamont Benson
Respondent:
Warden and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Faria et al
as 7:2022cv03743
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Benson
Defendant:
Gabriel Alexander Faria, Sr., Celia Denise Washington and Paschall Truck Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
