Cases 1 - 10 of 24
THOMPSON v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, JASON THOMAS BRENES CATINCHI and JAQUELINE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson #313944 v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bernard Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, JASON BRENES-CATINCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. USA
as 1:2019cv00151
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Christopher Thompson
as 19-10442
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD THOMPSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THOMPSON v. MCNALLY et al
as 2:2018cv04385
Plaintiff:
BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
TRISH MCNALLY and ROXBOROUGH HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 100 Washington DC Area Pension Fund et al
as 1:2018cv00526
Defendant:
Richie LaBille, Keith Knarr, James Noto and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Thompson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Melvin Thompson v. Secretary, Department of Corr.
as 18-10623
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
USA v. Christopher Thompson
as 16-17472
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD THOMPSON
THOMPSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2015cv00254
Petitioner:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
