Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STOKES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02127
Petitioner:
Mark Stokes
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURER'S INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ TREJO
STOKES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01088
Petitioner:
MARK STOKES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
Bernardo Rodriguez Trejo
Leonardo Sanchez Montero v. Gary Bernardo Rodriguez et al
as 2:2020cv00761
Defendant:
Bernardo Rodriguez Gary and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Sanchez Montero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rodriguez v. NYS Department of Corrections & Community Supervision
as 1:2016cv06335
Petitioner:
Bernardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
NYS Department of Corrections & Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Bernardo Martinez
as 15-10743
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ, also known as Pamo
USA v. Bernardo Rodriguez-Gallego
as 15-10221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ-GALLEGOS, also known as Gumaro Vigil-Rodriguez
USA v. Bernardo Rodriguez-Gallego
as 13-11303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ-GALLEGOS, also known as Gumaro Vigil-Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21934
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Rodriguez
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. USA
as 5:2010cv00112
Petitioner:
Bernardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez et al v. Hickey/Higing et al
as 2:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Rodriguez and Edgar A. Graciani
Defendant:
Hickey/Higing, E-B Unit Team, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
